MGT-7027 the Johnson v. The Transportation Agency case, and any ancillary cases. Then, determine how to best address a situation like this in the future. Be sure to address the following key points in a paper:

1. Explain the conflict between the parties of Johnson and The Transportation Agency MGT-7027
2. Explain why the holding in this case is so important. Determine whether this opinion stands for the proposition that affirmative action programs are unconstitutional. Explain why.
3. Summarize if The Transportation Agency impermissibly took into account the sex of the applicants in the promotion process to violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
4. Evaluate the ethics of this case and suggest potential alternative means which might be used outside the court system to resolve this dispute.
5. MGT-7027  your workplace environment to explain how this case affects gender relations and what actions you can take to minimize a recurrence of the case situations.

Support your paper with a minimum of five resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.

Upload your document and click the Submit to Dropbox button.