Explain in a paper what you have learned about worksite protection for employees to address the following:

1.   MGT-7027- Week 3               Under the decision in the Metro-North Commuter R.R. Co. v. Buckley case, explain when a duty arises for the defendant Metro-North to protect its employees.
2. Explain what the court suggests that Metro-North should have done in this case that would have satisfied the duty.
3. Determine if railroad workers have the right to invoke the Federal Employers’ Liability Act to sue their employers for emotional distress due to asbestos, or some other disease-causing carcinogen, exposure if it has not made them ill. Explain your reasoning MGT-7027- Week 3
4. Identify the role situational business ethics and moral relativism play in the employee’s personal circumstances and that of Metro-North’s ethical conduct in this case.
5. Provide a detailed summary of what steps the employer could have or should have taken to mitigate the situation.
6. Explore the affect this case could have on your workplace.

Support your paper with a minimum of five resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

MGT-7027- Week 3

Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. MGT-7027- Week 3Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.