(Done Paper) Full Structure to Include: Title Page, Abstract, TOC, Introduction, Lit Review, Methodology, Findings and Analysis, Conclusion, References.

//(Done Paper) Full Structure to Include: Title Page, Abstract, TOC, Introduction, Lit Review, Methodology, Findings and Analysis, Conclusion, References.

(Done Paper) Full Structure to Include: Title Page, Abstract, TOC, Introduction, Lit Review, Methodology, Findings and Analysis, Conclusion, References.

Full Structure to Include: Title Page, Abstract, TOC, Introduction, Lit Review, Methodology, Findings and Analysis, Conclusion, References.

 

Total Word Count not including Title Page, Abstract, TOC and References = 13000-15000 Words

 

Introduction: 1000-1500 Words

– Give insight into the problem statement as per the Proposal ‘When considering key measures for delivery success with the financial services, methodology conflicts, and synergies, what are the sensible interaction points for the Traditional and Agile Methodologies to coexist in Harmony? Is there a need for a hybrid methodology to existing?’

– Talk about the businesses needing to be able to plan 1, 3 and 5 years in advance whilst remaining completely flexible to adjusting that strategy based on market demands

– Discuss why we have Delivery Structures (focus on major cross functional change)

– Introduce the 2 delivery methodologies (Traditional and Agile) that are being compared here

 

Literature Review: 4500-5000 Words

– Discuss how different organizations require delivery structures for different reasons (Make sure that you cover in the examples Financial services because of governance and control in a heavily regulated environment and how that differs from some others)

– make a point of what delivery methodologies are and are not (Change the bank rather than running the bank – Not production support)

– Reference Agile and Traditional as the 2 most common Delivery Methodologies

– Review both Methodologies

– Talk about the control differences

– Talk about the risks of using the wrong methodologies/delivery structures for the job (don’t forget to talk about the people aspect)

– Also create a table of the key differences

 

Methodology: 1500 words

– Review Lit Review, talk about confirm the Secondary Review methodology and why it is the best option here

 

Findings and Analysis: 4500-5000 Words

– Critically review the strengths and weaknesses of the Methodologies

– Focus in on Agile lacking control and its strengths more in line with Development projects that are innovative and lack upfront requirements

– Focus on Traditional being more controlled and its strengths being more in line with major cross functional change that spans many months into years

– Evidence that both methodologies are exceptionally good when used in the right way however, can have detrimental impact when not

– Discuss synergies of the 2 Methodologies

– Layout the findings in a way that positions Traditional methodologies strengths as big picture, strategy execution, program level execution and Agile being best for application development

– Provide scenarios where one would be better than the other

 

Conclusion and Recommendations: 1000-1500 Words

– Focus in more on Traditional methodologies strengths as big picture, strategy execution, program level execution and Agile being best for innovative application development

– Recommend further study into a new Hybrid Methodology that draws on the strengths of the 2 discussed

– Put the Words into a Diagram (Like Visio) showing what a hybrid delivery model could look like

– Free software here that will do this: http://www.yworks.com/products/yed

 

Click to Download Solution

Purchase Solution $25

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [25.79 KB]

By | 2018-08-03T18:08:07+00:00 August 3rd, 2018|Management|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment