Caillois offered us four categories for games and two orientations to play,

//Caillois offered us four categories for games and two orientations to play,

Caillois offered us four categories for games and two orientations to play,

Caillois offered us four categories for games and two orientations to play, Koster framed games (and the fun of game experiences) in relation to learning, and Sicart situated play as an ontological and epistemological activity (i.e., as a way of being in the world and as as way of knowing and expressing in that world). Choose two of these three authors and tell me how, in your view, their ideas can be understood as complementing/supporting of one another? (Be sure to use specific details from the texts).

Caillois offered us four categories for games and two orientations to play, Koster framed games (and the fun of game experiences) in relation to learning, and Sicart situated play as an ontological and epistemological activity (i.e., as a way of being in the world and as as way of knowing and expressing in that world). Choose two of these three authors and tell me how, in your view, their ideas can be understood as complementing/supporting of one another? (Be sure to use specific details from the texts).

Click to Download Solution

Purchase Solution $26

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [14.70 KB]

By | 2019-10-30T11:19:00+00:00 October 30th, 2019|Technology|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment